This is a blog for journalists, authors, and those who enjoy reading and learning. Here you will find a variety of posts about all forms of writing--from fiction and non-fiction to the news media and journalism. It is produced by a former foreign correspondent and journalism school dean.
(To receive automatic updates of my blog just enter your e-mail address in the box below and please check out the www.ronaldyatesbooks.com website)
When Doctors Without Borders Ebola nurse Kaci Hickox vowed to fight a state-imposed
quarantine in Maine, I was reminded of a case of another woman who also fought
against being quarantined and who became infamous for doing so.
Her name was Mary
Mallon, but she was better known as Typhoid Mary--the first person in the
United States recognized as an asymptomatic carrier of the pathogen associated
with typhoid fever.
"Typhoid Mary in Quarantine"
Unlike nurse Hickox,
who is possibly facing a 21-day quarantine (the incubation period for Ebola) in
her home, Typhoid Mary spent nearly 30 years forcibly isolated on New York's
North Brother Island.
So just who was
Mary Mallon was born
in Ireland in 1869 and came to the United States as teenager where she lived in
New York with an aunt and uncle until their death.
Alone in the
nation's largest city, the resourceful Mary first worked as a housekeeper in
several homes. Then, in 1906 she was hired as a cook for a wealthy family in
the fashionable Oyster Bay community.
Within two weeks 10
of the 11 family members were sick with typhoid. Mary moved on to three more
households. In each case wherever Mary Mallon worked typhoid outbreaks occurred
and each time that happened, she moved on.
One family stricken
by the disease hired Dr. George A. Soper, an epidemiologist and sanitation
engineer to investigate. Dr. Soper was a typhoid fever expert and was aware
that the disease was often passed on by immune carriers, though he had yet to
identify such a person.
By contrast, Ebola
survivors who have developed immunity to the virus apparently do not carry the
disease nor pass it on. In fact, some survivors are being trained to care for
children in Liberia and Sierra Leone, according to the UN's UNICEF agency.
That was not the
case with the typhoid outbreak of 1906, however.
As Dr. Soper began
his investigation he looked into the Oyster Bay family's eating habits. He investigated
the possibilities that the illness was transferred through oysters or that sewage
pipes could have tainted the family's drinking water.
Finally, he focused
on the kitchen staff. He soon identified Mary as the likely cause. Dr. Soper
checked into her work history and discovered that most of the families she
worked for in the past had suffered from typhoid outbreaks as well.
Soper ascertained that most of the food Mary served her
employers was cooked (and therefore most likely safe from typhoid). However, Soper
concluded that Mary's trademark ice cream and peaches dessert very likely
infected the family.
By now, Mary was no longer working for the family that hired
Soper and because she never left forwarding addresses when she left a
household, it took considerable effort to track her down.
When he finally did locate her, Mary was unwilling to
cooperate. Dr. Soper explained that Mary was infecting families with her
cooking and asked her to provide urine and feces samples. As the story goes,
Mary became so upset with the request that she chased the doctor from her
kitchen with a large carving fork.
That was only a temporary reprieve for Mary, however. Dr.
Soper reported Mary to New York City's Department of Health and convinced them
to send a female health inspector, some policemen and an ambulance to bring her
in for testing. When they arrived at the house, Mary ran and hid. They finally
found her some three hours later and dragged her away, kicking and screaming.
Testing concluded that Mary did carry the typhoid parasite. But
why didn't she fall ill with the disease? A 2013 study by the Stanford
University School of Medicine found that the salmonella bacteria that causes typhoid fever hides in immune cells
known as macrophages, a type of immune cell. The study said that if the germs
are successful in pulling that off, then an infected person like Typhoid Mary
can unknowingly spread the pathogen without falling ill herself.
According to the study: "Individuals
can develop typhoid fever after ingesting food or water contaminated during
handling by a human carrier. The human carrier may be a healthy person who has
survived a previous episode of typhoid fever yet who continues to shed the
associated bacteria, Salmonella typhi in feces and urine. Washing hands with
soap before touching or preparing food, washing dishes and utensils with soap
and water, and only eating cooked food are all ways to reduce the risk of
The Department of Health offered Mary Mallon a deal: give up
cooking and she could go free. But Mary refused to promise anything and in 1907
she was quarantined on North Brother Island.
It didn't take long for New York's sensational newspapers to
discover the story. They immediately christened her "Typhoid Mary." One
newspaper illustration depicted Mary breaking egg-sized skulls into a skillet.
Just as nurse Kaci Hickox's situation has resulted in
opposing opinions, so it was with Mary Mallon. Many Americans were convinced
that Mary's civil liberties were being violated, while others viewed her as a
public health menace.
Mary's quarantine on North Brother's Island ended in 1910 when
a new and sympathetic health commissioner released her on condition that she
never work as a cook again.
But five years later health officials traced an outbreak of
typhoid fever at Sloane Maternity Hospital in Manhattan to a "Mrs. Brown,"
the facility's cook. "Mrs. Brown" turned out to be Mary Mallon. She
was immediately sent back to North Brother Island, where she was forced to
remain for the rest of her life. She died there on November 11, 1938, having
lived a total of 26 years on the island.
Ebola Nurse Kaci Hickox
Among the 47 typhoid infections Mary Mallon caused, at least
three deaths were definitely attributed to her. However, because she used so
many aliases and refused to cooperate with health authorities, the exact number
is not known. Some officials estimated that she may have caused 50 fatalities.
The world has changed since 1915 when Typhoid Mary was quarantined
for the final time. Nurse Hickox will never have to worry about being sent to a
place like North Brother Island--even if she were to be found to have ebola.
But just as Mary Mallon insisted in 1915 that her civil
rights were being violated by the authorities, so too has Kaci Hickox, who asserts
she is not infected with the ebola virus.
Which leaves us with the same questions that were being
asked almost 100 years ago when Typhoid Mary was quarantined: namely, when and
under what circumstances can an individual's civil rights be trumped by the broader
public's right to safety?
Last week the FBI officially warned news organizations that
it has received "credible information" that a splinter group of the
Islamic State has been ordered to kidnap journalists in the Mideast and take
them to Syria.
I am not surprised by this news. It is, after all, a
well-known tactic of Islamist terrorists to kidnap and murder journalists.
Beyond the obvious political reasons for kidnapping and
murdering journalists is another less apparent motive.
Journalists, especially those from nations with a free press,
disseminate information and there is nothing Islamic fundamentalists and
terrorists hate more than free-flowing information. With information comes
knowledge and the last thing religious fanatics like the Islamic State want is
an informed and educated people who can actually think for themselves.
In its rare intelligence bulletin to news organizations the
FBI warned that the group will attempt to hide its affiliation with the Islamic
State in order to gain access to unsuspecting correspondents, cameramen and
The bulletin also cited an online post by an Islamic State
supporter who wrote that media personnel such as "anchormen, field reporters
and talk show hosts" were "prioritized targets."
The Islamic State has already beheaded two American
journalists, James Foley and Steven Sotloff, and two British aid workers. The
group is believed to be holding a several other Western hostages.
The Committee to
Protect Journalists reports that more than 70 journalists already have
been killed covering the Syrian conflict since it began in March 2011.
The U.S.-based organization estimates 30 local and
international journalists are missing in Syria. One of them is Austin Tice, 33,
a former U.S. Marine working as a freelance reporter for The Washington Post
and McClatchy Newspapers who was kidnapped August 2012 while working in Syria. (You
can watch a video about Tice by clicking on the link at the end of this post.)
Kidnapped Journalist Austin Tice
In light of the recent beheadings and the obvious danger of
covering the civil war in Syria and brutal behavior of the Islamic State in
Iraq, several American news organizations have stopped sending journalists to the
Instead their reporters file reports from Turkey and Lebanon
and rely on secondary sources inside Syria. They also interview refugees and
aid workers and monitor social media in the region.
As someone who once covered wars and revolutions from Asia
to Latin America I can't imagine trying to cover a conflict without actually
being on the ground where the fighting is taking place.
The closest I ever came to such a situation was the brief Falklands/Malvinas
war between Great Britain and Argentina in 1982. Several hundred journalists
(me included) were not allowed by Argentina to travel to the Falkland/Malvinas
Islands. Instead, we had to cover the war from Buenos Aires and the Sheraton
Hotel, where the Argentine authorities had set up a press room (AKA
"Rubber Room") on the third floor.
There, we received government handouts that provided highly
sanitized military reports on how the war was going. While it was the safest I
had ever been while covering a war, it was also the most frustrating experience
of my career as a war correspondent.
After an evening of consuming too much Argentine beer and
wine eight of us correspondents decided to charter a fishing boat to take us to
the islands. We actually found someone willing to do it for $5,000, but at the
last minute the boat's captain refused to go, saying he had been warned that if
he tried the Argentine Navy would sink his boat with all hands.
Looking back on it, I think I would rather have taken my
chances of surviving an attack by the Argentine Navy than reporting the story from
Covering war is dangerous work. As a noncombatant you risk
being shot, shredded by shrapnel, or blown up by a mine or improvised explosive
device. But covering war AND shielding yourself from fanatics like those in the
Islamic State is asking a lot of reporters and photographers.
Sadly, many of the journalists who are putting themselves in
harm's way today in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan are freelancers.
For freelancers covering war has always been the fast track
to establish their journalistic chops and work their way into a professional
news organization. Reputations are made this way.
It takes guts to go into a war zone with little more than
the clothes on your back and the vague promise that if you file enough "good
stuff" you might "get a shot at the big time."
My advice to those who feel they MUST race off to places
like Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan: Make
haste slowly. Life is already short. And I have yet to find a story that was
worth more than my life, insignificant as it may be.
As a colleague of mine at the Chicago Tribune always told me: "Take
time to stop and smell the flowers."
Good advice that.
(The link below will take you to a video about Austin Tice)
One of the saddest events of the past ten years or so has
been the inexorable demise of the brick and mortar book store. Fully half of
the bookstores in the United States have vanished in the past ten years.
Gone are places like Borders, Crown Books, B. Dalton,
Kroch's and Brentano's, Oxford Bookstore, Atlantic Books and Davis-Kidd
A few are still hanging on. Barely. Barnes & Noble, for
example, and Follett's, Book Off USA, Hudson News and places like the sprawling
and immensely popular Powell's Books in Portland, Oregon.
But for the most part, physical books stores are being
shoved aside by online booksellers like Amazon, Alibris, AbeBooks.com, Biblio.com,
The exception to this trend were recent reports by CNBC and
Wall Street Journal that Amazon is planning on putting up a physical retail
book store across from New York City's Empire State Building.
So far there has been no confirmation from Amazon.
But even if that were to happen, most experts see the demise
of brick and mortar book stores continuing as more and more readers chose to
buy their physical and e-books online.
So what can be done?
I recently received an e-mail containing an intriguing idea.
It came from author Doug Preston, who along with co-author
Lincoln Child, has written such bestselling books as Relic,Riptide, Mount Dragon,
Gideon's Sword and The Lost Island.
Preston attached a note containing an idea for saving book
stores and helping authors sell more books in them. The idea was from author Daniel
Handler, aka Lemony Snicket, who has written books like The Basic Eight, Watch Your Mouth, and Why We Broke Up.
Rather than paraphrasing Handler's note and idea, I will
include it here verbatim and add some final thoughts:
"Whether or not
you are an author published by Hachette (as I am), you may lately feel as if
you are engulfed in a rather unpleasant flood -- as if the fate of your books
is whirling dreadfully out of your control, battered by the waters of some
enormous South American river, the name of which I cannot remember at the
"While all this
fierce sword fighting rages on without you, you may find yourself feeling even
more hapless and hopeless than authors usually do, while your local independent
bookstore struggles with a similar feeling that it's some sort of jungle out
There is Nothing Like a Book Store
"As a tonic,
allow me to suggest a new program, cooked up by assorted interested parties and
named, after some tipsy debate, Upstream.
The idea is to connect authors with their local independent booksellers
to offer signed books as an alternative to, say, larger and more unnerving
corporate machinations. Upstream was
test-piloted this summer and is now spreading steadily, like optimism or syphilis.
"How does it
work? Easily, hopefully. Here are some numbered steps.
"1. Choose and
contact a bookseller close to your home.
If you cannot find one, the good folks at Indies First, coordinated by
the American Booksellers Association, can be of service. They are quite excited about the launching of
this new and hopefully enormous campaign.
"2. The bookstore
will order and sell your books; you will sign them. Perhaps you'll stop by at regular intervals
with your pen, or perhaps you can convince, with cake or gin, the bookseller to
come to you.
"3. Both you and
the bookseller will promote this arrangement as best you can, spreading the
word not only about an exciting source of signed books to your readers anywhere
in the country, but about a program anyone can join.
"Feel free to
tell your publicist you're participating.
Upstream should be in full swing in time for the holidays, when signed
books are good gifts for loved ones and distance acquaintances alike.
rescue us all from strife and worry? Of
course not. But the hope is that it will
remind both authors and booksellers of their local, less monolithic resources,
and improve general esprit de corps at a disheartening time.
"With all due
aka Lemony Snicket"
It sounds like a great idea. I have yet to approach any of
my local bookstores about it, but I plan to. It seems like a win-win
proposition. It's an opportunity to have authors in the store signing books and
for readers to interact with authors.
E-book sales are fine. I have nothing against them. In fact,
most of the sales of my own books have come as a result of Kindle, Nook and
Kobo book sales.
But as convenient as e-books are they are also impersonal.
You can't sign an e-book or talk to readers.
And let's not forget. What exactly are e-books? They are a
collection of computer code that we essentially lease from companies like
Amazon. Think about it. You can loan your physical books to as many people as
many times as you wish.
But that is not the case with e-books. You may think you own
an e-book, but you really don't. If you want to loan a Kindle e-book to a
friend you must make sure the person you are loaning it to is using compatible
e-book software. Then you can lend it only once for 14 days--and even then, you
need to belong to Amazon's "Prime Program," which costs extra.
For an author like me, another frustration with e-books is
this: if everybody on a train, or bus or plane is reading an e-book, I can't
tell what they are reading. There are no covers, so I don't know if they are
reading one of my books (highly unlikely) or one by J.K. Rowling, John Grisham, or Stephen King.
Finally, (and for me this may be the most important point) I
like bookshelves. And I like bookshelves with lots of books sitting in them. An
office or den or family room without a bookshelf filled with books seems naked
Maybe that's why I like brick and mortar bookstores and why
I hope they never vanish completely.
They have LOTS of bookshelves filled with books that you can
pick up, handle, thumb through, take home and put in your own bookshelves.
When I look at the world that creative thinker and inventor
Nikola Tesla envisioned in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries, I think it
is a shame that this man never dabbled in science fiction.
The world Tesla foresaw, along with his inventions and ideas,
was so far ahead of his time that they seem to have come from the realm of
science fiction. Contemporaries such as sci-fi masters H. G. Wells, Jules
Verne, and Edgar Rice Burroughs must have taken inspiration from Tesla.
Yet, today, few Americans are aware of this genius and his
contributions to our world.
Tesla is the kind of character those of us who write
historical fiction love to create and insert into our stories--brilliant,
innovative, intractable, mysterious, intriguing, reclusive, eccentric.
What he wasn't, unlike concurrent inventor Thomas Edison,
was wealthy. Even after holding 700 patents, developing the Alternating Current
(AC) electrical system, partnering with Westinghouse, and designing the
nation's very first hydroelectric power plant in 1895 at Niagara Falls, N.Y., Tesla
often was unable to fund his own research.
Perhaps his boldest
project was an idea in 1900 to build a global wireless system for the transmission
of electricity using a special tower he constructed at Wardenclyffe, N.Y. It was a system that Tesla said could provide
"free electricity" to the whole world--not something profit-minded entrepreneurs
like Edison and Westinghouse were in favor of.
Unable to generate funding for his tower project, he
eventually abandoned the idea. And that wasn't the end of his commercial disappointments.
Dozens of his valuable inventions were usurped and patented by others. These
include radar technology, the induction motor, the dynamo, the rotating
magnetic field, and x-ray technology.
Tesla, who was born in 1856 in Smiljan, Serbia (Croatia
today), was an optimist who imagined a primarily utopian world where new
scientific discoveries, rather than violent conflict, would guide humanity. He
was a man less concerned with making money than with innovating for the public
“Today the most civilized
countries of the world spend a maximum of their income on war and a minimum on
education," he once said. "The
twenty-first century will reverse this order. It will be more glorious to fight
against ignorance than to die on the field of battle.”
While that hopeful prediction has failed to materialize,
many of his other forecasts were amazingly prescient.
Minds like Tesla's come along maybe once every few hundred
years. Leonardo da Vinci comes to mind, as does Benjamin Franklin, Albert
Einstein and Thomas Edison.
In addition to Tesla's native intelligence and creativity,
we have his mother, Djuka Mandic, to thank for providing the spark to her son's
powerful intellect. This was a woman who spent her spare time inventing small
household appliances. No doubt she was a powerful influence on the young Nikola.
She also made sure he obtained a first class education.
He began his studies
in the 1870s at the Realschule in Karlstadt, Germany. Then he moved on to the
Polytechnic Institute in Graz, Austria, and finally studied at the University
Tesla immigrated to the United States in 1884 and almost
immediately began working with famed American inventor Thomas Edison. The two
parted ways after a short time because of differing business and scientific
Thomas A. Edison
Tesla did not have the commercial and marketing instincts
that Edison had. He also battled Edison over their competing electrical
systems. Tesla developed the AC or alternating current system of generators,
motors and transformers still in use in most of the world today, while Edison favored
the DC or direct current system.
Tesla held 40 patents on his AC system, all of which he
eventually sold to George Westinghouse. In a well-publicized battle of wills
and technologies, Tesla and Edison went head to head with their competing
electrical systems at Chicago's 1893 Columbian Exposition. Eventually Tesla and
Westinghouse defeated Edison and his General Electric Co. when the exposition
opted to use the AC system to light its sprawling array of buildings and
The two remained bitter enemies the rest of their lives.
Here are some of Tesla's other ideas and inventions:
Tower Wireless Energy Transfer System. This aforementioned system was
introduced at the 1893 Exposition in Chicago. Tesla demonstrated that you could
transmit electricity wirelessly via a series of phosphorous light bulbs in a
process he called "electrodynamic
induction." He believed his technology would enable wireless
transmission of electricity over long distances through the upper atmosphere, thereby
supplying even the most remote locations with the energy needed to live
comfortably. Tesla actually succeeded in
lighting 200 lamps without wires from a distance of 25 miles and shot man-made
lightning into the atmosphere using a Tesla coil, a transformer antenna he had
patented in 1891. Today, more than a century later, companies such as Intel and
Sony are working to apply wireless energy transfer to devices such as cell
phone batteries so you can charge them without power cables.
·X-rays. Tesla's research in the field of
electromagnetism helped give radiologists everywhere the ability to peer into a
person's anatomy without cutting them open — a concept that, in the late 1800s,
sounded far-fetched. Although German physicist Willhelm Röntgen is widely
credited with the discovery of X-rays in 1895, Tesla's own experiments with the
technology eight years before Röntgen demonstrated the dangers of using
radiation on the human body.
In the 1930s Tesla reportedly invented a particle beam weapon (laser). The device
was, in theory, capable of generating an intense targeted beam of energy that
could be used to dispose of enemy warplanes, foreign armies, "or anything
else you'd rather didn't exist." The so-called "death ray" was
never constructed. Tesla shopped the
device around to the military without success.
Tesla predicted a future rife with robots that "would be able to perform labor safely and effectively." He
envisioned a world filled with "intelligent
cars, robotic human companions, sensors, and autonomous systems." In
1898, he invented and demonstrated a radio-controlled boat which many credit as
the birth of modern robotics.
Machine. In 1898, Tesla declared that he had constructed and set up a small
oscillating apparatus that, when activated in his office, nearly shook down the
building and everything around it. The device weighed just a few pounds, but
Tesla was able to tune the timing of the oscillator at such a frequency so that
each vibration created enough energy to shake apart almost any man-made
structure. Realizing the destructive power and the potential disasters his
oscillating device could cause, Tesla later said that he smashed the oscillator
with a hammer, and told his employees to claim ignorance if anybody asked what
had caused tremors.
When you put these five ideas and inventions into the context
of the time (the late 19th and early 20th Centuries) you have the ingredients
for several extraordinary science fiction novels.
Tesla died impoverished in 1943 in the New York hotel where
he lived. Toward the end of his life, Tesla had been working on several ideas
for new weapons. It was during World War II and any new weapon was coveted by
both the allied and axis powers. That's why within hours of Tesla's death, the
FBI seized all of his belongings, detailed schematics and notebooks.
Among the items seized were Tesla's plans for the
"Death Ray." After World War II the U.S. government established a
secret project to turn Tesla's particle beam weapon idea into reality, but the
project was shut down and the results of the experiments were never published.
Sounds like the starting point of an intriguing book.
Predicting the future can be a daunting, if not a sometimes embarrassing
occupation. I have already posted on this topic a few times because as a writer
of historical fiction I think it adds something when characters look ahead and
wonder what the world will be like in one hundred or two hundred years.
Unfortunately, not all of us can be accurate prognosticators.
Even the geniuses and giants of science and industry have faltered from time to
Here are a few examples:
television may be feasible, but I consider it an impossibility--a development
which we should waste little time dreaming about."--Lee de Forest, 1926, inventor of the
cathode ray tube
think there is a world market for maybe five computers."--Thomas J. Watson, 1943, Chairman of the
Board of IBM
doesn't matter what he does, he will never amount to anything."--Albert Einstein's teacher to his father,
will be years - not in my time - before a woman will become Prime Minister."
--Margaret Thatcher, 1974
'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of
communication. The device is inherently of no value to us."-- Western Union internal memo, 1876
don't like their sound, and guitar music is on the way out." -- Decca Recording Co. rejecting the Beatles,
the hell wants to hear actors talk?"--H. M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927, pooh-poohing the idea of sound in
ought to be enough for anybody."-- Bill Gates, 1981
Pasteur's theory of germs is ridiculous fiction." -- Pierre Pachet, Professor of Physiology at
in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." -- Popular Mechanics, forecasting the
relentless march of science, 1949
don't need you. You haven't got through college yet." -- Hewlett-Packard's rejection of Steve Jobs,
who went on to found Apple Computers
are interesting toys, but they have no military value."-- Marshal Ferdinand Foch in 1911
Marshal Ferdinand Foch
over 50 foreign cars already on sale here, the Japanese auto industry isn't
likely to carve out a big slice of the U.S. market."-- Business Week, 1958
happens, the U.S. Navy is not going to be caught napping." -- Frank Knox, U.S. Secretary of the Navy, on
December 4, 1941, three days before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
·"Stocks have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau." --
Irving Fisher, Professor of Economics,
Yale University, October 16, 1929, thirteen days before the "Black
Tuesday" stock market crash and the beginning of the Great Depression.
Then, there these gaffes from the past:
·King George II said in 1773 that the American
colonies had little stomach for revolution.
·An official of the White Star Line, speaking of
the firm's newly built flagship, the Titanic, launched in 1912, declared that
the ship was unsinkable.
·In 1939 The New York Times said the problem of
TV was that people had to glue their eyes to a screen, and that the average
American wouldn't have time for it.
·An English astronomy professor said in the early
19th century that air travel at high speed would be impossible because
passengers would suffocate.
Someone once said that an optimist is someone who thinks the
future is uncertain.
In my continuing examination of the way people of the past
predicted the future, here is yet another look at some interesting forecasts
from long ago.
Why am I blogging about this? Because, as an author of
historical fiction I sometimes wonder what my characters thoughts might be about
the future. What kind of world do they envision? What will life be life 100
years hence? How will things like communication and transportation change? What
of society, morality, conflict and warfare?
I think adding those kinds of observations to characters in
historical fiction novels adds another dimension to their personas. For one
thing, all of us wonder at one time or another what the future will bring. Why
not the characters we create in our historical novels?
someone sent me an electronic copy of a Ladies'
Home Journal article from 1901 that talks about future predictions--what
the world will be like in the year 2000, just 14 years ago.
Here's a summary of those
·There will be 500 million people in the USA. (Close, but no cigar. There are 317 million
of us in a world population of 7.1 billion)
·The average American will be 1 - 2 inches taller
because of better health due to reforms in medicine, sanitation, food and
athletics. (Well done. The average height
of American males in 2014 is 5 ft 9.5 in and 5 ft 4 in for females. In 1900 it
was 5 ft 7.5 for men and 5 ft 2 in for women. Science says a better diet,
better health care, better sanitation are all contributors)
·The letters "C", "X" &
"Q" will be abandoned from the alphabet because they are unnecessary.
(The last time I looked those letters
were still in the alphabet--and quite necessary)
·Hot and cold air to heat/cool a house will come from
spigots. (We call them vents today and
yes, most homes are heated and cooled by forced air HVAC systems)
·Mosquitoes and flies will be essentially extinct.
(Sigh, not quite. The pesky insects are
still with us.)
·Foods will not be exposed to air prior to being
sold and storekeepers who do expose them will be arrested. (Well, if not arrested, then fined by health and food inspectors--IF
they are doing their jobs)
·Coal will not be used for heating or cooking. It
will be scarce but not exhausted. (It is
neither scarce nor exhausted and it is still used to power electrical plants.
So in that respect, this prediction is off the mark--though few, if any, folks
use it as fuel for stoves and ovens.)
·No more streetcars in cities. (This is pretty accurate, though some cities
are bringing these once ubiquitous urban conveyances back).
·Photographs will be telegraphed from any
distance (same day publishing) and will be in color. (Very prescient calculation)
·Trains will go 150 MPH. (NOT in America, sadly. But in Europe and Japan they do)
·Automobiles will be cheaper than horses. (Hmmmm. Not true UNLESS you are talking about
a stable of Kentucky Derby winners)
·Everyone will walk 10 miles. A man or woman who
cannot walk 10 miles will be considered a weakling. (I would wager that not everyone in today's world can walk 10 miles.
Weaklings, I am afraid, abound)
·You will be able to travel from the USA to England
in 2 days. (How about in just a few hours?
An unfathomable concept back in 1901)
·There will be airships. (There will be, but most today are seen hovering over football stadiums)
·There will be aerial warships and forts on
wheels. Fleets of airships, hiding themselves in dense smoky mists, will float
over cities and hurl deadly thunderbolts onto unsuspecting foes below. Giant
guns will shoot 25 miles or more and destroy entire cities. (Airships no, but squadrons of stealth
bombers and fighters capable of launching nuclear weapons that can destroy
entire cities are here)
·There will be no more wild animals, except in
menageries. The horse will have become practically extinct. Food animals will
be bred to expend practically all of their life energy in producing meat, milk,
wool and other by-products. (While the prophet here was wrong about wild
animals and the horse, he or she was fairly accurate about domestic animals.
Not a pleasant existence for many of today's domestic animals)
·Telephones will be everywhere. (Yep...everywhere...and are we better for it?
That is up for debate.)
·Grand Opera will be telephoned into private
homes. (I assume this prediction is not
about the Grand Ole Opry. In any case, music of all kinds is indeed in our
homes--via cable, satellite, etc.)
·Store purchases will be made by
"tube". Pneumatic tubes, instead of store wagons, will deliver
packages and bundles. The same for mail. Fast automobiles will distribute
purchases from house to house. (Hmmm. Was
this person envisioning Fedex, UPS, etc? Possibly. But thank God the pneumatic
tube idea never came to pass. Can you imagine a city linked by millions of pneumatic
tubes whisking refrigerators and flat screen TVs from Best Buy or Costco in
giant tubes of forced air? I think I would rather live in the Amazon basin)
·Strawberries will be as large as apples. (Why? Will they taste better? I don't think
·Roses will be as large as cabbage heads and come
in many colors, such as black, blue and green. (I have nothing against multi-colored roses, but why as large as
cabbage heads? Will they look better? I doubt it. Who wants a black rose?)
·Oranges will grow in Philadelphia because
science will have discovered how to raise in cold climates many fruits now
confined to much hotter climates. (Was
this person envisioning "hot house" vegetables and fruit that have
little or no flavor?)
·Few drugs will be swallowed or taken into the
stomach. Drugs needed for the lungs, for instance, will be applied directly to
those organs through the skin and flesh. They will be carried with electric
current applied without pain to the outside skin of the body. The living body
will to all medical purposes be transparent. Not only will it be possible for a
physician to actually see a living, throbbing heart inside the chest, but he will be able to magnify and
photograph any part of it...via rays of invisible light. (This prediction is really quite amazing. Almost everything it suggests
is fact today.)
·Man will see around the world. Persons and
things of all kinds will be brought within focus of cameras connected electrically
with screens at opposite ends of circuits, thousands of miles at a span.
American audiences in their theaters will view upon huge curtains before them
the coronations of kings in Europe or the progress of battles in the Orient. (Another prescient forecast, possibly
foreseeing satellite TV broadcasts that we take for granted today.)
·A university education will be free to every man
and woman. Poor students will be given free board, free clothing and free books
if ambitious and actually unable to meet their school and college expenses. The
very poor will, when necessary, get free rides to and from school and free
lunches between sessions. In vacation time poor children will be taken on trips
to various parts of the world. Etiquette and housekeeping will be important
studies in the public schools. (Interesting
ideas...some of which have indeed been adopted. I am not so sure about those
etiquette and housekeeping classes though.)
So what do you
think? How accurate was the Ladies' Home Journal of 1901? I give them an
"E" for Effort.
A few weeks ago I wrote a blog post
that discussed how people in the past predicted the future and I promised a
sequel. Here it is with another sequel to follow.
Back in 1895 several prominent
newspaper editors were asked to speculate on what newspapers would look like in
the 20th Century. Some of their predictions were quite uncanny, and some were,
well, a bit off the mark.
Here are a couple of examples:
·Felix Agnus,Editor of the Baltimore American: “Today I saw a new invention that distributes
written messages to its customers, the matter clearly printed on convenient
sheets. The inventor tells me he can afford to place these at a very moderate
cost in offices or in homes. All it needs is a long roll of paper. It does the
rest. Now what is to prevent the people of the next century from having their
news continuously? As soon as an event occurs it is broadcast over the wires
and is immediately printed by the automatic machine. How will a newspaper
published once a day compete with a scheme such as that?”
Sounds a lot like something we used
to call a telex machine. They never made it into homes, at least not on a large
scale, but they were in just about every newsroom in the world.
·Then there was this prediction from A.G. Boynton, editor of the Detroit Free Press:“Keeping...with the
limits of the possible, this much is safe to forecast….there will be great and
marked progress in independence—that the newspaper of the twentieth century
will not be tied, as the newspaper of the nineteenth century is far too often,
to a party, a sect or a creed."
Sadly, Mr. Boynton's vision of today's newspaper has proven
to be more aspiration than reality. News today is too often skewed by
reporters, editors, producers and publishers to fit their own political agendas
or world views. I should acknowledge, however, that for a while in the 20th
Century the concept of trying to achieve some form of objectivity and fairness
in reporting was rigidly adhered to in the best newspapers. At least it was at
the newspapers I worked at.
Mr. Boynton's predictions and
others appeared in an article that appeared in the Tacoma Daily News March 30,
We are able to enjoy this 120-year-old
article because of Readex, a company that for seven decades has specialized in
providing access to primary source research materials such as early American
Newspapers. Here is a link to the Readex blog: http://www.readex.com/blog
and a link to the actual article:
Many of these editors had already personally
witnessed amazing advancements in newspaper publishing, the Readex article
pointed out. They had seen newspapers
progress from the old Washington hand press to enormous printing presses
capable of producing tens of thousands of newspapers in just a few hours; from
the Pony Express and stage coach to the telephone and telegraph; from hand-setting
type to typesetting linotype machines and the halftone photo reproduction
And while some of the predictions
may seem a little quaint, given The Internet and today's 24-hour news cycles, I
am amazed at how prescient these editors were.
Here is James Elverson, editor of the Philadelphia
characteristic of the twentieth century newspaper must necessarily be
correlated with the twentieth century scientific inventions….If the flying
machine is perfected, every first class reporter will have one. If the air ship
is a success, they will distribute tons of newspapers daily. If telegraphy
becomes an exact science, the inmost heart of man will be revealed daily to the
public. If Esoteric Buddhism gathers the world to its bosom and Mahatmas drops
messages about the present, past and the future through newspaper roofs from
the desert of Gobi, then every first-class newspaper will have its staff of Mahatmas
to preach ethics to its readers. Pneumatic tubes may distance trains; photo
scopes may reproduce pictures 10,000 miles away, and possibly the kinescope may
be so adapted that every reader may have one in his house in which to view the
scenes of which he reads in his favorite newspaper, the photographic strips
therefore being issued as supplements. Possibly we shall not use type any more,
but by some complex arrangement issue rolls that shall run through phonographs.
Then, as the twentieth century man sits down to breakfast he can have the news
read to him while he sees every event in the kinescope, and at the same time he
can swallow his morning meal.”
Sounds a lot like watching CNN or
FOX while eating your oatmeal. And don't forget, this was BEFORE the invention
of radio or television.
Percy S. Heath, editor of
the Cincinnati Commercial Gazettemay have foreseen the ubiquitous "Op Ed" page of today's
·“A forum, where
the people may go with ideas and grievances, and appeal to public opinion. This
to my mind will be the feature and the characteristic of the future newspaper.
I believe the forceful utterances of the press will come direct from the
people; that the intelligent reader is becoming every day a man or woman of
opinion, of fixed ideas, and that sentiment will be expressed more and more
freely through the press by those not directly connected with it. There will be
less arbitrary editorial expression. The ‘fourth page’ will contain that thought
of the reader which up to this time the editor has sought to forestall or
Knapp, editor of the St. Louis Republicseems here to presage the way many of us customize the news we get from
our online newspapers.
·To fulfill its
mission perfectly, (the newspaper) will be issued not once, or twice, but half
a dozen times every day. Perhaps also the great fin de siècle newspaper of the
twentieth century will be issued in several different editions varying
radically in the character of their contents, so as to meet the varying wants
of different classes of subscribers and at the same time obviate the undue
enlargement of its size. It is bound to be more comprehensive in the exhaustive
completeness of its information than the newspaper of today, but it will not be
necessary for every reader to take the whole daily encyclopedia. Those who wish
will have the opportunity to designate certain classes of news to be sent to
them, and in some degree every subscriber will have the privilege of ordering
his newspaper made to fit his own individual and particular wants."
George A. Robertson, editor
of the Cleveland Worldsees
newspapers using several "new" inventions to collect and disseminate
news faster. He also sees the use of more photography. However, his vision falls a little short when
it comes to his altruistic view of the 20th Century newspaper.
·“Already within sight are numerous remarkable inventions that
will be made use of to improve the newspaper of the future. A machine is
already patented and in limited use that sends messages by wire ten times as
fast as the present telegraphic code and these messages are automatically
written out as they arrive. This will be employed by the coming newspaper in
improving its news facilities. A machine for transforming pictures by wire will
be fully perfected within the near future and there will be such a cheapening
of engraving processes that newspapers will be much more fully and beautifully
illustrated than at present. Telegraphic accounts of happenings in all parts of
the world will be accompanied, as received, with engravings ready to be dropped
into the forms….Sensationalism is on the wane and the time will come early in
the next century when the newspaper that lies will be considered as despicable
as the man who does the same thing now. The twentieth century newspaper will
not be entirely composed of the record of the ‘evil that men do,’ but some the
good things will be mentioned also.”
Finally here is Frank A. Richardson, editor
of the Baltimore Sun. While I applaud his optimism concerning the human
laudable vision of scrupulous and truthful editors, there are far too
few of these trustworthy souls toiling in today's newsrooms.
with the march of time becomes more noble and elevated, the newspaper, which is
at once the leader and the follower of public sentiment, must share in this.
Therefore I should say the newspaper of the twentieth century must be conducted
on a higher plane. Its great aim must be to instruct and purify, rather than
merely amuse for an idle hour and increase its circulation by pandering to the
baser instincts of humanity. There are a few striking instances among the
leading newspapers of this day where the desire for gain is not made the
paramount consideration. In the twentieth century this will become more and
more apparent, for incentives to the contrary course which exist now will
disappear. The newspaper of the next century will be guided by the hand of
strictest truth and honor, for policy, if not conscience, will make it so.”
Perhaps the most troubling part of
this story is the fact that of the 13 newspapers polled in this 1895 exercise,
only four are still being published today. That none of the editors could
foresee the demise of their own newspapers is not surprising to me.
The 1890s were an optimistic decade
in American history with a young nation just beginning to flex its political and
economic muscles on the world stage.
Given the gloomy, often deplorable world
we live in today with its poverty and wars waged by religious fanatics like
ISIL with its beheadings and mutilation of innocents; its pervasive drug use;
the decline of the traditional family; the inexorable secularization of society
and with it the relentless obliteration of morality, integrity and civility; I
wonder how today's 21st Century editors would foretell the world of the 22d