In a recent interview with several book bloggers about my
book Finding Billy Battles, I was
asked if the transition from journalist to writer was difficult. Here is how I
answered:
It was not as difficult as some people might think. For one
thing, journalists ARE writers. In fact, writing compelling nonfiction is in some
ways even more difficult than writing fiction. For one thing, you are
constrained by the facts, the people you talk with and the events you cover,
whereas authors of fiction are allowed to invent facts, people and events.
Some of the writing I am most proud of during my days as a
foreign correspondent with the Chicago Tribune were my longer form cover
stories I wrote for the Chicago Tribune
Sunday Magazine. These were 3,000-5,000 word profiles of people and events
and places.
For example, I once did a cover piece on Bangkok's Klongs
(canals) and the people who live and work along them. I did another on the
Amazon River basin and yet another on late Total Quality Management guru W. Edwards
Deming. I still look at those pieces and marvel that I even wrote them.
I consider my 27 years as a journalist the best training
ground I could have had for writing fiction. I learned how to gather
information, how to organize it and how to write it compellingly. Reporting is
the journalist's word for Research.
And research is critical to anybody who
writes historical fiction--or any fiction for that matter, even science
fiction. If you don't have a command of some science, scientific theory,
physics, or some other facet of scientific thought when attempting to create an
imagined world or universe, your readers will not be able to suspend belief.
For one thing, they won't trust you.
As I learned during my life covering war, revolution and
other forms of mayhem from S.E. Asia to China to El Salvador and Nicaragua, trust
is critical for a journalist. It is a key measure of one's credibility. Without
credibility a journalist is nothing more than a hack.
Today hundreds of thousands of hacks populate the
blogosphere spewing forth whatever they want with little or no credibility to
back them up. Many have no idea how to do accurate news gathering and instead
grab whatever they can from secondary or tertiary sources to support whatever
political agenda they may adhere to or are intent on promoting.
That is NOT journalism. That is "Hackery." I think the same can be
said for lazy authors who fail to do requisite research for their books.
So, for me the transition from journalist to author of
fiction was fairly seamless. Granted, writing fiction requires a different form
of creativity. You are, after all, creating people, events, places, conflict,
etc. from some inner place.
In my case, I have attempted to do my creating not
only from my inner muse, but from my own experiences and interactions with the broad
array of both good and bad but always fascinating people I came to know during
my days traveling the world for the Chicago
Tribune. That is why I call my book a work of "Faction."
No comments:
Post a Comment